Category Archives: Blog

Drawing is difficult

Drawing is Difficult
In our minds eye, we store a precious image, a schemata, a childlike representation of a generic eye. Looks a bit Egyptian,really. If you ask anyone to draw an eye it is this minds eye they draw.
And it is always full frontal. Never a side view.
If you ask for both eyes, they will be shown the same size, full front.
In fact the two eyes are almost never seen full front.  The eyes are seen side on and are different sizes, the far one seeming smaller.
When we draw, it is the picture in the minds eye that guides us. It provides the mental map. The problems begin when our subject looks at our drawing and declares” That doesnt look at all like me” Clearly my mental map and yours differ.
Enter the idea of objective drawing. Drawing that is independent of your schemata or mine or anyone elses . Drawing based on Platos conjecture of a realm of perfect forms,that behave predictably under given conditions.Conditions that themselves could be calculated.Distance,lighting,even shape changing depending on viewpoint.
Objective drawing is Renaissance. It is inseparable from Humanism,science and the rest of it  because, paradoxically it elevated  the observations of an individual who claimed those observations could be made by anyone and confirmed.
There remains a puzzle. If this new way to draw is so objective,how come each artist is so easy to recognize? Why arent they all the same.?
It appears my mental map is still with me,,constantly ” correcting” my drawing. Telling me that eye should be larger. But i just measured it , dammit. It really IS that small. “Cant be” says mental map, so in doubt i measure again.
Instructors are full of tricks to minimize the mental map.
Draw the whole thing upside down. Draw ignoring the fact that its an eye and look only at …………(insert lines,shapes,or other) . Draw using half a brain. Draw using a black glass,a viewfinder, a mirror, red perspex or a reducing glass. Try binoculars back to front. Squint a lot.
The minds eye will not be denied. It corrects line length and angle, moves objects around in space, distorts colour and tone. Eventually we realise that drawing is the outcome of a dialogue between the minds eye and the objective world. How we deal with that conflict defines in large measure the sort of artist we are,and the sort of drawing we produce.
Final irony. Only when we get the influence of the mental maps of the minds eye under control can we produce that drawing of our subject which is met with” my God, it looks exactly like me!” The minds eye of both artist and subject are appeased by the objectivity ..(or realism, idealism,insert label.
What i have learned here in New York is that such beautiful drawing is possible today. It was possible before, but for some reason we have excluded ourselves. The minds eye at its corrosive worst is doubt.

 

Related Images:

Greenberg and collage

“Kitsch, using for raw material the debased and academicized simulacra of genuine culture, welcomes and cultivates this insensibility. It is the source of its profits. Kitsch is mechanical and operates by formulas. Kitsch is vicarious experience and faked sensations. Kitsch changes according to style, but remains always the same. Kitsch is the epitome of all that is spurious in the life of our times. Kitsch pretends to demand nothing of its customers except their money – not even their time.” [3]
According to Clement Greenberg, this is all that is available to the uneducated masses. The artist remains linked to clients (state or church,bank or business,public or private) by “an umbilical cord of gold” .The true artist maintains traditions and promotes them but is essentially conservative, and positions himself in the dialectic of his time.
Producers of kitsch have no such ideals.
Handle with care. This is the champion of Jackson Pollock, then Post Painterly abstraction and all things flat. As with all things,Greenberg himself is now passe.
 Yet  undeniably his essay on Cubism titled .”Collage”is brilliant, and for me, reinforces my suspicion that one of the major discoveries of Modernism (along with Surrealism and Fauvism ) was dropped before it was explored,and remains an invitation over a century later.
Flatness has a venerable history. The Duchess has pointed out the anti illusionism in Klimt and l’arte Nouveau and the espousal of flat design in art textbooks of the first decade of c20. Japanese influence on impressionists and realists is well documented. Puvis de Chavannes was admired for his (flat) fresco designs . By 1910 we have collage and by 1899 we have notan.
What Greenbergs essay on Collage reintroduces is the understanding that Cubism was born in and about a debate concerning illusion,reality,depth perception,pictorial space and planes……a highly technical debate,that is still open, and even more so now that academic realism has reentered the scene.Clearly, Picasso and Braque did not want to pursue Analytical Cubism further, having  Synthetic Cubism to play with. Only Gris stayed home. It is not a matter of flat v round, of illusion v reality,of 3d perspectival systems v a planar structure in front of the picture plane. It is an entirely new visual language that few knew how to speak, let alone listen to.
And inevitably we arrive back at kitsch.There is a kitsch version of analytical cubism, another of academic idealism. And just as reliably there are artists, dealers and buyers of such. Either blissfully unaware or diabolically opposed to the “real thing”
 ” Real artists.” Will always struggle to present. They always have. But despite the difficulties they must strive to promote not only the current commission, but a philosophy,an agenda, a code, founded on the”genuine” as opposed to ..”the spurious” The contemporary Atelier movement is at the heart of this production.

Related Images:

After the football

After the Football
The Superbowl result shocked the World!..
……hang on Brian, you have been here too long.
It shocked football fans in America. The World was not watching, but Americans are brought up to believe that it is. Its a kind of almost endearing innocence, a bit like believing in Santa.
It affected our drawing instructor. For a week now he has been admonishing people who are….wait for it…..”dropping the ball.” Clearly you cannot win the game if you keep dropping it..
In the early stages almost noone drops the ball.( except the Denver Broncos who took 13 seconds to drop the ball) Concentration is high, the game plan is clear.
Map out the “kite”. Locate your drawing on the paper,highest and lowest, left and right. Check your angles with the kite by connecting the dots.
Now develop the kite into the envelope and further into the silhouette. All this while , use a flowing straight line applied very light (it needs to disappear later )  Draw vectors not contours. A bit like Bargue.
Ok, now map the form shadow. (Can have other names like terminator, crescent,block in. )Keep your work loose. Dont commit yourself to a mark that cannot be changed.  The need for toughness of the paper is apparent, and quality of your erasers. A word on pencils. Have them sharpened to a very long lead. This allows broad swathes of hatching,as well as needle point.
Now hatch ( using 45 parallel ) the big shadow shapes.
At this point opinion diverges. Do you lightly rub over with a very soft tissue? Do you apply a layer of graphite dust? Or go the purist route and continue working with the pencil.? Do we use a stump.?  A mechanical pencil with a 0.7 HB lead.?If you are working on toned paper this is the time to work the lights, because once rubbed, the conte wont take.
We have our shadows blocked. Block lights as well with the eraser .Now we work from the form shadow back into the light. The subtle transitions here are critical. A sudden transition is occasioned by a rapid change of angle in the surface,slow transitions by gradual change. I saw you drop the ball and finger smudge!
By this time you have been working on your drawing for 4 or 5 sessions of 3 hours.
Now is when the ball usually  gets dropped. The drawing looks pleased with itself. But we have only just begun the rendering process. We are in front, but its only halftime.
The tones have to be darkened layer by layer, and we begin to lighten by lifting out with the eraser. At the same time, working form modelling using a needle point. Sometimes using parallel hatching,sometimes a circular motion controlling pressure,sometimes irregular squiggles,sometimes cross hatch..The whole time we are refining the drawing,making changes,defining form shadow and cast shadow.Once you think its fixed,you drop the ball. Its an attitude thing. Motivation required.
And now the suprise.Provided we havent dropped the ball the endgame is rewarding. The layers of graphite build up on the clay surface of the paper, revealing and concealing texture. It is a very sensual experience as the layers begin to mimic human skin.
And now you know why i am a convert. The final results can look ” more real than a photo”  Its eerie. 5 mornings a week for 4 weeks. Apparently thats what it takes,and why “slow art” has been used to describe what is essentially a sculptural approach.If it is,its like carving a marble block with a toothpick.
“Game over, wheres the cawfee? Anybody got the ball?”
Brian Deagon
10/01/14

Related Images:

New York

Costa Vavagiakis gave me drawing 101.

Have your paper oriented vertically ,remove distractions like perforations. have a sheet of the same type under to cushion. Keep your distance (arms length if you have the strength). Prepare several strips of paper to be used to measure ,use as a straight edge and even a plumb bob but a Skewer or knitting Needle is Best..Then having dropped a vertical from eye To foot of my model,all was revealed, and was wrong

He has painstakingly explained how to sharpen a pencil, then how to hold it.
And it is clear that he. Despite his work being highly worked and reworked, sees there is a problem with highly rendered work, if the rendering is only there because the artist didn’t know when to stop. In that case he would prefer a 5minute gesture drawing
Michaels teaching is very Zen. In 5 weeks of my daily attendance he has not come near me,spoken to me, or looked at my drawing. I think I get the point,and it’s a mystical self affirmation.

Related Images:

Juliette Aristedes

In Classical Painting Atelier the assertion is made that “Classical” painting is based on Knowledge, Logic and Order. Consider the alternative. Art based on ignorance, irrationality and chaos. And that is exactly what has occurred. This is not to imply that art based on either proposition is superior to the other,it is just that the two worldviews may be incompatible.

The human form graced the historical,religious, political narratives that dominated art from the Greeks to the C19.. Landscape,still life were “lesser’art forms. Aristedes suggests this derives from the religious assertion that God created man in His image.Kenneth Clark says the Greeks turned Gods into men, and we turn men into gods.
The destruction of the human form represents a loss of faith ,and the dissembling of the old order was paralleled by the demise of the Atelier.
Robert Newton in “The Visual Language of Painting” notes Aristedes’ revivalist tone, and suggests that a return to traditional realist art can never return in the forms it has taken in the past.
Now I want to draw attention to the fact that we have two issues that are constantly getting tangled.
The first issue is the “revival or survival or archival” of realist art. Here we are faced with the art market, its dealers ,critics,curators,investors and vested interests.
The second issue is related, but not the same.This is the debate over the curriculum of the “art factories” and there I include Fine Arts faculties and departments in tertiary institutions; and the private Ateliers that have mushroomed.
If the Ateliers produce highly skilled technical art devoid of contemporary relevance and alienated from modern values and experience, and if Fine Arts faculties produce pieces reeking of contemporary relevance and displaying a conspicuous lack of skill, then surely it is time to dialogue.
What would the curiculum of a 3 year full time degree look like if we tried for the best of both worlds? Lets rethink the whole thing.

Related Images:

Spit and Polish

 I have mused about the cultures that tend to Realism before. The Dutch invented the stock market and still life and exported both to Boston and New York. Academic Realism that Americans preserve from C19 English Empire and C19 French Academies, has the same love of detailed “finish”. . The passion for  accurate detail gave Florence double entry bookkeeping and Botticelli, and America its utilitarianism and Andrew Wyeth. They bring the same aesthetic to the nude as they do to chrome automobiles.

This realisation about the limits of realism came to me in Boston, where gallery after gallery displayed the same, beautifully painted bowl of strawberries on a white plate. The problem was, they were all by different artists. The aesthetics and ethics of mass production! Polished highlights on surfaces everywhere, and the artist has become an interchangeable part.

A similar problem bothers me with the academy drawing. So long  as it is understood from the first mark, that this drawing is a learning experience, not a work of “Art”. The question “What does a nude do?” is followed by ” When is a nude finished?”

Its gratifying to be agreed with. This comment from Brian Froud says he “gets”it. “I’m always amazed when I look at American fantasy art. Its over-rendered. Every surface is shiny so your eye skids off the art. So do your emotions”

Related Images:

Kant and Heidegger

Imagine God behind a screen and us in front of it. Kant says we have invented the screen upon which we project the world. God is unknowable behind it.  Heidegger says God made the screen, but in an odd twist he says the screen projects or creates us.God is equally hidden behind the screen.

These are the antecedents of contemporary philosophy, and its introspection and irrelevant God. I am  still struggling with its impact on the visual arts, but starting with Foucault.

Critique of Foucault is like attacking a fog. Armed and alarmed, I wield simile and metaphor extended, spinning and kicking,  hoping a knife will pierce the heart of the fog.

Related Images:

Rarrk

Documentary on Marwundjul. He states that he “saw” rarrk in the flashes of light on the water. I know what that is, but wont paint it. I have always been and feel balanda. But I have seen ,”me myself” rarrk in the criss-cross of palm fronds. Here, completely at home in the tetrachrome palette  I can see a way to abstraction that is mine, and not needing ceremonial validity.

I should mention here, that I had the privilege of being taught by Marwundjul on a visit to Maningrida.He said, that as an artist I was “a bit rusty rough one”

Related Images:

Ryan’s Tips

Hold your painting up so that visually it is adjacent to what you are painting. Make sure the light on the painting and the subject are consistent. Now you can mix a colour , place a little patch on the edge of your canvas, and directly compare it with the colour in the scene you are trying to match.

Hold your thumb over a patch of colour so its shadow falls on your patch. The tone and colour is exactly what is reqiured for the next tone down in painting your object.

Colour Matching. Choose the closest colour youve got and mix it to the correct tone. Select the colour immediately beside on the colour wheel on the side you want to shift. Mix this to the correct tone.  Now mix the  colour. Some adjustment for chroma  may be required.

Related Images: